执行83页，iOSREHookerTweak 后，和书上的结果不一致

技能讨论
1

Dec 5 22:32:31 iPhone iOSRETargetApp[2512] : iOSRE: Found CPPFunction!
Dec 5 22:32:31 iPhone iOSRETargetApp[2512] : iOSRE: Found ShortCFunction!
Dec 5 22:32:31 iPhone iOSRETargetApp[2512] : iOSRE: Found ShortCFunction!
Dec 5 22:32:36 iPhone iOSRETargetApp[2512] : Junk:
Dec 5 22:32:36 iPhone iOSRETargetApp[2512] : iOSRE: CPPFunction: This is a hijacked C++ function!
Dec 5 22:32:36 iPhone iOSRETargetApp[2512] : Junk:
Dec 5 22:32:36 iPhone iOSRETargetApp[2512] : iOSRE: CFunction: This is a C function!
Dec 5 22:32:36 iPhone iOSRETargetApp[2512] : Junk:
Dec 5 22:32:36 iPhone iOSRETargetApp[2512] : iOSRE: CPPFunction: This is a hijacked C++ function!

书上最后一个输出是 iOSRE: CPPFunction: This is a hijacked short C function from new__ZN8CPPClass11CPPFunctionEPKc!

第三个ShortCFunction 确实是调用了 CPPClass::CPPFunction， 执行hook，判断条件是 strcmp(arg0, “This is a short C function!”) == 0，执行的是else语句，和书上的结果相反？

2
3

:+1::+1:

4

这个回答不对吧，明显是else判断不对，而不是短函数被hook了